Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Har-Mar Collision, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 2015No. 1140631Published

1ConcurrenceMurdock, Justice

Scottsdale Insurance Company seeks mandamus relief from this Court in regard to the Mobile Circuit Court’s decision to deny its motion to dismiss certain claims against it for lack of standing. I concur in the denial of this petition.

As a general rule, interlocutory appellate review is not available by way of a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to overturn a trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss or its denial of a motion for a summary judgment. Ex parte Liberty Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 825 So.2d 758, 761-62 (Ala.2002). Among the exceptions to this general rule is one that allows this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans ServicingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Wyeth, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. 27001 Partnership v. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API