Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re O'Keefe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 5, 2010No. 2010-B-1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

| .ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Michael H. O’Keefe, Jr., an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension based upon his conviction of a serious crime. In re: O’Keefe, 09-1059 (La.5/27/09), 9 So.3d 846.

UNDERLYING FACTS

In 2007, respondent was indicted by a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Louisiana on charges of conspiracy to *1241defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and engaging in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. In re BoudreauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  4. In re KirchbergSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. In Re KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Marc R. EngelmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API