Duncan v. New England Power Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a complaint for damages under the mill act. G. L. c. 253. The case comes before us on exceptions to a ruling of the judge to the effect that the petitioners were not entitled to recover. There is printed as a part of the bill of exceptions a long exposition to the jury by the judge of the law relating to the subject. This was a *230needless expense and under the circumstances was irrelevant to any question presented by the exceptions. Cohen v. Berkowitz, 215 Mass. 68, 71. Churchill v. Churchill, 239 Mass. 443, 445.
The pertinent facts are that the defendant completed and began operating…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Mabardy v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Churchill v. ChurchillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Stratton v. Mount Hermon Boys' SchoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Cohen v. BerkowitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. New England Aircraft Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Bratton v. RudnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Kabatchnick v. Hanover-Elm Building Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.