Legal Opinion

Kilsheimer v. Davis

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 2, 1995No. 61PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

In this appeal, we confront the proper interpretation of Maryland Rule 2-402(e)(3), which governs the award of fees to expert witnesses in regard to discovery. In particular, we consider two awards granted by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County in connection with a multiparty wrongful death action1 instituted by appellees Ashley Fahy and the Estate of Glen Fahy (together, “the Fahys”).

At a settlement conference with the court on July 6, 1994, the parties settled the underlying tort case. At that time, however, they were unable to agree on the amount of fees for two…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Baltimore Transit Co. v. MezzanottiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Dennis Hurst and Joyce Hurst v. United States of America and Don HightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Bartholomee v. CaseyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Maxima Corp. v. 6933 Arlington Development Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Pressman v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORECourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MixterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. Holzman v. Fiola Blum, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Wahl v. Northern Improvement Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. StarkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Frison v. MathisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API