Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Contico International, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
AHRENS, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal by the third-party plaintiff Contico International, Inc. (“Contico”) from a summary judgment granted in favor of third-party defendant Alexander & Alexander, Inc. (“A & A”). A & A cross-appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (“Hartford”) on A & A’s indemnity cross-claim. We reverse and remand.
The following facts were stipulated to by the parties. Defendani/Third-Party plaintiff Contico is a manufacturing concern with facilities in Missouri, California, and Texas, with approximately 2,000 employees. In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Colgan v. Washington Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Schimmel Fur Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Frame v. Boatmen's Bank of Concord VillageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Steele v. EllisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- General Electric Capital Corp. v. RauchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. v. Tri-Lakes Title Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Franklin v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
- Stephen C. Jenkins v. Klt, Inc. Klt Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.