Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Contico International, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1995No. 66305PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by the third-party plaintiff Contico International, Inc. (“Contico”) from a summary judgment granted in favor of third-party defendant Alexander & Alexander, Inc. (“A & A”). A & A cross-appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (“Hartford”) on A & A’s indemnity cross-claim. We reverse and remand.

The following facts were stipulated to by the parties. Defendani/Third-Party plaintiff Contico is a manufacturing concern with facilities in Missouri, California, and Texas, with approximately 2,000 employees. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Colgan v. Washington Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Schimmel Fur Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Frame v. Boatmen's Bank of Concord VillageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steele v. EllisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  2. General Electric Capital Corp. v. RauchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. v. Tri-Lakes Title Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Franklin v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
  5. Stephen C. Jenkins v. Klt, Inc. Klt Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API