Legal Opinion

Agnew v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1997No. 79A02-9511-CR-699PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Martan Sherard Agnew (Agnew) appeals his conviction of rape, a class B felony. 1 Agnew presents two issues for our review:

1. Whether the behavior of the state’s key witness during and after a taped replay of Agnew’s testimony interfered with his right to a fair trial.

2. Whether the prosecutor impermissibly shifted the burden of proof to Agnew by stating during closing argument, “if you believe he’s guilty, he’s guilty.”

We affirm.

Agnew and M.R. were students at Purdue University. The two became acquainted when Agnew began dating one of M.R.’s roommates. On the evening of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Currin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barnett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Sturma v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Parks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Hall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Ozuna v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API