Legal Opinion

Lord Mfg. Co. v. Nemenz

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1946No. Civil Action 81PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE S. GOURLEY, District Judge.

This is a suit for declaratory judgment, pursuant to(the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, and the questions presented arise under Sections 8(a), 8(b), and 8(c) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308(a, b, c).

The plaintiff, Lord Manufacturing Company, is concerned merely with having its rights, duties and responsibilities determined. It stands in a position of neutrality in so far as the claims of the various defendants are concerned. The plaintiff, in substance, is in the position of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Kay v. General Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  3. In re the Will of WalkerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Globe-Democrat Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Cbs Inc. v. International Photographers of the Motion Picture Industries, Local 644, I.A.T.S.E.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Newman v. McCullough, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. Foor v. Torrington Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried EmployeesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API