Tucci v. Arbusto
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
I will not sign the proposed decree on default until proper process has been issued.
I. In this ease the libel is entitled in personam, but its prayer sounds both in personam against the co-owner Arbusto, and in rem against the Aranac II.
I shall treat, it, therefore, as a libel in licitation both in rem and in personam.
Aside from the fact that the libel is not headed as being in rem and in personam in the present ease, the form of libel is precisely in the form given by Benedict on Admiralty (5th Ed.) vol. II, page 28.
II. The difficulty with the situation here is that,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Steamboat Orleans v. PhœbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- The John E. MulfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883
- The Ocean BelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1872
- Coyne v. CaplesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1881
- The Emma BDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Madruga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952