Legal Opinion

Iwinski v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1984No. Appeal, No. 1723 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Williams, Jr.,

Michael Iwinski, an assistant horse trainer, has appealed from an order of the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission (Commission) affirming his exclusion, by Eagle Downs Racing Association (Eagle Downs), from the stable area at Keystone Race Track.

On January 19, 1983, the Commission granted Mr. Iwinski a license to work at race tracks in Pennsylvania. The agency described the license as being “temporary in nature.”1 Soon after receiving his license, Iwinski applied to the officials at Keystone Race Track for permission to work there. By a written notice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Belote v. State Harness Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Kulick v. PA. ST. HARNESS R. COMM.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Bensalem Racing Ass'n v. State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API