Legal Opinion

Wildstein v. Barbaro

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel G. Albert, J.

In this proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, petitioner seeks a judgment declaring that respondent “ is estopped to deny that petitioner’s housing needs are $187 a month for so long as petitioner remains contractually liable to pay such rental by the terms of a lease authorized and approved ” by a representative of the respondent.

The undisputed facts depict what is believed to be an unusual situation. The petitioner is a recipient of public assistance. She is a widow with two children, one of whom is a 13-year-old girl suffering from cerebral palsy, who can only be transported by…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. ShuartNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Murphy v. WymanNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Viverito v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  4. Valdes v. KirbyNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API