Legal Opinion
AgustaWestland North America, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 23, 2018No. 2017-1082PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hughes, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from a decision of the Court of Federal Claims enjoining the United States Army from proceeding with, or awarding, a contract to Airbus Helicopter, Inc. The Court of Federal Claims found that Army Execution Order 109-14, which implemented the Army’s Aviation Restructure Initiative designating the UH-72A Lakota helicopter as the Army’s “Institutional Training Helicopter,” was a procurement decision in violation of the Competition in Contracting Act and relevant provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. After supplementing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Murakami v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Safeguard Base Operations, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Agile Defense, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Advanced Management Strategies Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Advanced Simulation Technology Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.