Legal Opinion

Biddle v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1985No. G000918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, J.

Petitioners W. Scott Biddle and Edward D. Lohrbach seek a writ of mandate compelling the trial court to set aside its order expunging the lis pendens recorded against the Paulson’s real property. The question presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion by expunging a lis pendens for a technical defect in service, although the property owners had actual notice and had failed to raise the defect in two prior motions to expunge.

Petitioners filed a complaint in superior court against William and Frances Paulson to recover payment on a note and to impose a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tate v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Farrar v. McCormickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Kendall-Brief Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Otsuka v. BalangueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Chapman v. GipsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coventry Homes, Inc. v. Scottscom PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. Turkanis v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Carr v. RosienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. (PS) Kan v. Verdera Community Assoc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. Haq v. Khatib CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API