Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1931No. 14301PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary; punishment, ten years in the penitentiary.

The testimony for the state seems to conclusively establish appellant’s, guilt. There being no contention in appellant’s brief as to the sufficiency of the testimony, we see no need for setting same out at any length.

The state introduced one Churchill, a self-confessed accomplice, and reliance was largely had upon his testimony for conviction. Bill of exception No. 3 complains of the overruling of appellant’s objection to the testimony of this witness, made upon the ground that the witness was at the time of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Underwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Spann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Riles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Herrington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Trammel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API