Legal Opinion

Gina McKeen-chaplin v. Provident Savings Bank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 5, 2017No. 15-16758PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

This appeal presents the question of whether a class of mortgage underwriters are entitled to overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., for hours worked in excess of forty per week. We conclude that, because the mortgage underwriters’ primary job duty does not relate to the bank’s management or general business operations, the administrative employee exemption under 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(1) and 29 C.F.R. § 541.200(a) does not apply, 1 and the underwriters are entitled to overtime compensation.

I

Provident…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Watts v. Silverton Mortg. Specialists, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019
  2. Philip Fowler v. OSP Prevention Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  3. Deluca v. Farmers Ins. Exch.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Sean Kennedy v. Las Vegas Sands CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. Allen v. Vocatus, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API