State v. Guzman
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
¶1 Defendant Fernando Antonio Guzman appeals his conviction on one count of rape, a first degree felony. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-402 (LexisNexis 2017). 1 Defendant contends that the trial court erred in excluding evidence under rule 412 of the Utah Rules of Evidence, that the trial court erroneously admitted hearsay evidence and violated his constitutional right to confrontation, and that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence at trial to support his conviction. We affirm.
BACKGROUND 2
¶2 In November 2011, Victim, who was then fifteen years old, was a patient at a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- State v. WelshCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- State v. WelshCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022