Legal Opinion

State v. Barbee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 2018No. WD 80736PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

But one thing I want you guys to understand is the State is not saying that he had sexual intercourse like you and I think of where it's a complete act, and I am not going to get gross, but what I want to say is that under the law, sexual intercourse is penetration, however slight, of the female sex organ by the male sex organ. So if you are rubbing your penis around in the vagina, that's penetration however slight.[3 ] And in the instructions, it uses the word whether or not an emission results, whether or not there is ejaculation. Penetration, however slight, is sexual intercourse.

Following…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State of Missouri v. Blaec James LammersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. State of Missouri v. Christopher C. ClaycombSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  5. State v. LATALLSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnny M. Thomas v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Pervis McAllister v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State of Missouri v. Allen John Dale AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State of Missouri v. Brenda F. MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State of Missouri v. Carlton James DickersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API