Legal Opinion

Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1987No. Appeals, 2942 C.D. 1985 and 3057 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

David Barasch, as Consumer Advocate, and the Equitable Gas Company cross-appealed from an order of the Public Utility Commission (commission) which permits Equitable to increase its service rates.

On January 4, 1985, the Equitable Gas Company filed Supplement No. 50 to its Tariff Gas-Pa. PUC No. 20. Equitable’s filing proposed changes in its rates, rules and regulations to produce an increase in annual revenues of $36,372,000 for retail gas service. The commission suspended Supplement No. 50 and began an investigation of the proposed rate change.

On March 1, 1985,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Porter v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Zia Natural Gas Co. v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Porter v. SC PUBLIC SERVICE COM'NSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Albert Einstein Healthcare Foundation/University v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API