Cassingham v. Berry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BRETT, C.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendant in error, a physician and surgeon, to recover damages for malpractice, which is alleged to have resulted in the death of the moth.er of the plaintiffs in error:
Parties to-this action will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiffs and defendant, as they appeared in the lower court.
The alleged facts upon which the plaintiffs seek to recover, briefly stated, are that Dr. Milroy was treating the plaintiffs’ mother, Mrs. Ella Jane Cassingham, as physician and'decided that the removal of her ovaries was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PagelsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- State v. DusenberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Huckshold v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Allen ex rel. Allen v. Ames College Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Martin v. Griffin Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Roark v. PetersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Aderhold v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Wells v. McGeheeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Mournet v. SumnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.