Legal Opinion

Roark v. Peters

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 5, 1926No. 27478PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

This is a suit for damages for physical injuries, pain, mental anguish, and expenses growing out of a Csesarean section operation performed upon Mrs. .Margery M. Roark by Dr. James I. Peters. The petition alleges that the operation was performed in a careless and negligent manner. There are several defendants, and plaintiffs pray for a judgment against them, in solido, for $26,996. The items of damage are enumerated as follows: $15,000, for which Mrs. Roark prays for judgment in her own right, for pain and mental anguish, and $5,000, as the cost of another operation which is alleged to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cassingham v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  3. Favalora v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Norton v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Wells v. McGeheeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API