Legal Opinion

In Re De Pascale

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 5, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Two interlocutory orders were made and entered in this matter on June 28th, 1943. One of the orders permitted the parties, appellant, and respondent, to take testimony before a special master therein named upon particular specified points. Prerogative Court rules 93 and 100. Rule 93 provides, in part:

* * * "that this court may, in its discretion, permit additional testimony not available in the Orphans Court, to be adduced in the Prerogative Court upon particular specified points."

Rule 100 makes the practice, procedure and rules of the Court of Chancery applicable to the Prerogative Court in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re CaseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  2. In re the appeal from the decree of the orphans court of the county of Camden dismissing the appeal from the order of the surrogate setting aside the probate of the last will & testament of FrankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1921
  3. In Re HerbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re SimpsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1945
  2. Hilco Property v. U.S.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API