Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Lindsey

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2002No. 91381Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE FREEMAN,

specially concurring:

I join in the result reached by the majority because the State did not charge defendant with indirect criminal contempt and the circuit court did not impose any punishment for contempt upon defendant. I do so with the understanding that where the State calls a defendant as an adverse witness at a probation revocation hearing, the defendant’s answers may not be used to support a finding of criminal contempt.

At least two Illinois courts have held that sentencing for contempt of court is a proper sanction for a violation of probation. See People v. Gallinger,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McCracken v. CoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. PatrickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. People v. ColclasureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. People v. GallingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API