Legal Opinion

Silva v. Menderson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1933No. Civil No. 3230PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

George P. Silva and William R. Silva, hereinafter called plaintiffs, brought suit against Charles Mendoza Menderson and Maryland Casualty Company, a corporation, hereinafter called defendants, to recover damages for certain alleged false and fraudulent representations made by defendant Menderson regarding lands purchased by plaintiffs through the agency of Menderson. Defendants demurred to the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations, which demurrer was by the' court sustained, and plaintiffs electing to stand upon their complaint, judgment was rendered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Peyroux and Others v. HOWARD AND VARION.Supreme Court of the United States · 1833
  4. Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Cassidy's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Cassidy v. DowdArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API