Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Waldbaum, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs’ contention that the trial court erred in refusing to submit the case on a theory of res ipsa loquitur is not preserved for appellate review (CPLR 4110-b; see also, Zito v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 122 AD2d 499, 500-501; cf., La Rocca v City of New York, 104 AD2d 753, 754). Counsel neither registered a specific exception to the court’s refusal to charge this theory at the charge conference nor interposed an objection subsequent to the delivery of the charge and before the jury retired. In any case, plaintiff failed to establish that the incident was "not * * * due to any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zito v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Wen-Yu Chang v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. La Rocca v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Calero v. Statewide Stor. Sys., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Pena v. Seacrest Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API