Legal Opinion

Pena v. Seacrest Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 18, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated August 4, 1999, which, upon granting the motion of the defendant LIPCO Electrical Corp. pursuant to CPLR 4401 at the close of the plaintiffs’ case to dismiss the complaint, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly refused to submit this case to the jury based upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. The plaintiffs failed to establish that the event was of a kind that ordinarily does…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ebanks v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Braithwaite v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Cacciolo v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Murphy v. Waldbaum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API