Legal Opinion

Schipporeit v. Khan

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2009No. 25112, 25128PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Tate and Sarah Schipporeit (Schipporeits) brought suit against Gha-zanfar Khan claiming breach of contract, conversion, and fraudulent misrepresentation. Schipporeits sought compensatory and punitive damages. A jury found in favor of Schipporeits on all claims and awarded compensatory and punitive damages. Khan asserts that the conversion and fraudulent misrepresentation claims, along with the punitive damages request, should have been dismissed because the claims were not independent torts apart from the breach of contract claim. We agree and reverse.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. SharpIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kunkel v. United Security Ins. Co. of New JerseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Smith v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Zochert v. Protective Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Knecht v. EvridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Kreisers Inc. v. First Dakota Title Ltd. PartnershipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Uhre Realty v. TronnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API