Legal Opinion

Pacific Mills v. Nichols

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 26, 1939No. 4622PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

In this action, defendant has filed a motion, under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for permission to inspect, copy or photograph certain designated papers, books, accounts and other records alleged to be material to issues raised by the amended answer which has been filed and allowed in this case. The following facts are made to appear:

Plaintiff returned and paid a tax upon $11,851,939 of income fop the year 1918. After a complete and thorough examination of plaintiff’s books and records, made in 1922, which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Crocker v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. United States Ex Rel. Girard Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hall v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  3. Western Maryland Railway Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  4. Morristown Trust Co. v. ManningDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
  5. Ashland, Inc. v. Gar ElectroformingDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API