Legal Opinion

Ashland, Inc. v. Gar Electroforming

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided July 22, 2010No. C.A. 08-227MLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARY M. LISI, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

It has been two decades since the United States first commenced an action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., to recover response costs associated with remediating a ten acre waste disposal site in Smithfield, Rhode Island, commonly known as the “Davis Site.” After several years of litigation to establish liability for the environmental contamination at the Davis Site, the case was resolved, in part by settlement memorialized in consent decrees, and in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Cadle Co. v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API