Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Martinez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 21, 1988No. 85-6553PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

In this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, we are asked to decide whether an individual sentenced to incarceration, but never ordered to report to prison because of a court clerical error, can be compelled to start serving his sentence seven and one-half years later when the government first discovers the mistake.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 1972 Martinez was employed as a business agent for the Teamsters' Union, in connection with which he was indicted for obstruction of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1503, and for conspiring to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hurd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Hawkins v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Vega v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API