United States v. Frank Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
In this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, we are asked to decide whether an individual sentenced to incarceration, but never ordered to report to prison because of a court clerical error, can be compelled to start serving his sentence seven and one-half years later when the government first discovers the mistake.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In 1972 Martinez was employed as a business agent for the Teamsters' Union, in connection with which he was indicted for obstruction of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1503, and for conspiring to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Hawkins v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Vega v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.