Legal Opinion

State v. Sanford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1980No. 41674PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of uttering a forged instrument in violation of § 561.011 RSMo 1969.1 On appeal he assigns two points of alleged error: (1) that he was precluded from presenting evidence to establish that he had not made any writing on the instrument; (2) that during closing argument, the prosecutor made improper reference to defendant’s failure to present evidence. We find no error and affirm the judgment.

The evidence supporting defendant’s conviction was that he had appeared at the credit cashier window in the Famous-Barr department store in downtown St. Louis and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. State v. RothausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. State v. HodgesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. BaileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. Van SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State v. WadeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API