Legal Opinion

Kirchoff v. Union Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 28, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, P. J.

The facts of this case as established by a preponderance of the evidence, are that in May, 1871, the insurance company loaned $60,000 to the complainant and plaintiff in error and her husband, Julius Kirchoff, and her mother, Angela Diversy, uj on their note secured by a trust deed conveying many parcels of land belonging to them in severalty, among which were lots 2 and 4 in block 21 of. the Canal Trustees’ subdivision of the south fractional quarter, Sec. 3, T. 39 N., R. 14, E. 3d P. M., which were the property of the complainant.

In 1878 there was default in payment. Reasons which are not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Sargent v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Ennor v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Bremer v. Calumet & Chicago Canal & Dock Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Mutual Mill Insurance v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morrow v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. KirchoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Union Mutual Life Ins. v. KirchoffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  4. Chicago & Calumet Rolling Mill Co. v. ScullyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  5. Odell v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API