Legal Opinion
Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Kirchoff
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 6, 1896No. 132PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
160 U.S. 374
16 S.Ct. 318
40 L.Ed. 461
UNION MUT. LIFE INS. CO.
v.
KIRCHOFF.
No. 132.
January 6, 1896.
This was a bill in equity, originally filed by Elizabeth Kirchoff, June 12, 1882, in the circuit court of Cook county, Ill., against the appellant, to enforce the specific performance of a certain agreement for the conveyance to her of two lots of land in the city of Chicago. The prayer of the bill was subsequently amended by the addition of a clause praying that the plaintiff might be allowed to redeem the premises according to the terms of said agreement.
The controversy between these parties has…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hume v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lodge v. TwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Kirchoff v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- California National Bank v. StatelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. KirchoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
- Hollander v. FechheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- States v. BroudeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.