Legal Opinion

Pitman v. Aran

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 23, 1996No. Civil AMD 94-2211PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DAVIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a diversity of citizenship action in which Maryland law is controlling. The plaintiffs’ claims for equitable relief and damages arise out of a series of unsuccessful entrepreneurial efforts, and are grounded upon allegations of mismanagement, self-dealing and outright dishonesty.

The plaintiffs are Maxine Pitman (“Pit-man”) and Vendóme Investment Group, Inc. (“Vendóme”), a Maryland corporation, and the vehicle through which Pitman and defendant Eli Aran (“Aran”) undertook to enter into various business ventures inter se. Pit-man and Aran…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Planmatics, Inc. v. ShowersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  2. Yancey v. National Center on Institutions & AlternativesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  3. (PS)Trinchitella v. Performance Realty Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Hernandez v. Woodstock Bar & Grill LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API