Pitman v. Aran
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a diversity of citizenship action in which Maryland law is controlling. The plaintiffs’ claims for equitable relief and damages arise out of a series of unsuccessful entrepreneurial efforts, and are grounded upon allegations of mismanagement, self-dealing and outright dishonesty.
The plaintiffs are Maxine Pitman (“Pit-man”) and Vendóme Investment Group, Inc. (“Vendóme”), a Maryland corporation, and the vehicle through which Pitman and defendant Eli Aran (“Aran”) undertook to enter into various business ventures inter se. Pit-man and Aran…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Planmatics, Inc. v. ShowersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Yancey v. National Center on Institutions & AlternativesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- (PS)Trinchitella v. Performance Realty Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Hernandez v. Woodstock Bar & Grill LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020