Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1980No. Nos. 79-1256, 79-1667PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*185ORDER

The Court, having considered petitions of respondent, Interstate Commerce Commission, for rehearing and suggestions for rehearing en banc and being now fully advised in the premises, hereby orders- the petitions for rehearing and suggestions for rehearing en banc denied. 8 Cir., 625 F.2d 178; 8 Cir., 625 F.2d 183.

Chief Judge LAY and Judge HEANEY would grant the rehearing en banc and dissent from the order of denial with the following comment: i

We would vote to grant rehearing en banc in the above entitled matter. Although we are in accord with the panel’s remand to require the Commission…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Elcor Corporation, Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Soo Line Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API