Legal Opinion

Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 30, 1978No. Nos. 76-2283, 77-1008 and 77-1487PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TONE, Circuit Judge.

New provisions governing the abandonment of railroad lines and the discontinuance of rail service were adopted by Congress as part of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (the 4-R Act), 90 Stat. 127, 146, §§ 802, 809(c), and codified as § la of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1a.1 Pursuant to these provisions, the Interstate Commerce Commission adopted implementing regulations. 41 Fed.Reg. 48520 as amended 42 Fed.Reg. 25327 (to be codified in 49 C.F.R. §§ 1121.10, et seq.). The several petitions for review before us challenge these…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. SchreiberSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. In Re Penn Central Transportation CompanySpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1974
  3. The Greyhound Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. In Re Penn Central Transportation CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Association of American Railroads v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. DonaldsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API