Legal Opinion
Bosc v. 39 Broadway, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 14, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
This is an application of approval of a compromise of a stockholders’ derivative action. Notice of the proposed compromise pursuant to Rule 23(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., was given to each preferred and common stockholder of record of the company at the close of business on February 16, 1948, and hearing on the proposal was had before me on April 21, 1948.
The action was commenced on June 5, 1946, and, before answer, the defendants Fred F. French Investing Company, Inc. and Fred F. French Operators, Inc. moved before me to dismiss the complaint on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Brown v. ShyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Keys v. LeopoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Everett v. PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Goldberg v. MeridorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Walden v. ElrodDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.