Legal Opinion

Natarajan v. Dignity Health

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2021No. S259364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA SUNDAR NATARAJAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DIGNITY HEALTH, Defendant and Respondent. S259364 Third Appellate District C085906 San Joaquin County Superior Court STK-CV-UWM-2016-4821 August 12, 2021 Justice Kruger authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and Justices Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Groban, and Jenkins concurred. NATARAJAN v. DIGNITY HEALTH S259364 Opinion of the Court by Kruger, J. Under California’s peer review statute, a hospital must afford a physician a fair hearing before revoking the physician’s staff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Haas v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Asiryan v. Med. Staff of Glendale Adventist Med. CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. Bichai v. DaVita, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Lin v. Board of Directors of PrimeCare Medical NetworkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API