Legal Opinion
State v. Goldman, 2006 Ca 103 (12-14-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 14, 2007No. 2006 CA 103PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Justin D. Goldman, appeals a judgment of the Clark County Common Pleas Court, finding him guilty of felonious assault and sentencing him to eight years in prison. Goldman asserts that verdict on the felonious assault charge was not supported by sufficient evidence and that it was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. He also contends that the trial court instructed the jury improperly and, because counsel did not object to the instructions, his counsel was ineffective. We determine that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence, that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Wilson, 22581 (2-6-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Henry, 22510 (5-1-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Henry, 2007 Ca 73 (7-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Banjoko, 21978 (2-1-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008