Sanford v. . Eighth Avenue Railroad Company
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Where the trial is by jury, we have no power under the existing rules of law to review any question of fact determined in the subordinate courts. In this case, therefore, we should be obliged to affirm the order granting a new trial, if that order could stand consistently with any view to be taken of the evidence given at the trial. But we are of opinion that after giving to the defendant the benefit of whatever conflict there may be in the testimony, and after examining the facts proved in the light most favorable to him, the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict.
It is said, and such is the…
2Cited by30 opinions
- People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Craker v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Rounds v. . Del., Lack. West. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- New Jersey Steamboat Co. v. BrockettSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Aiken v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.