Legal Opinion
Bratz v. Maring, Jr., Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 7, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHikmajst, J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act for the death of her husband, Gus Bratz, an employee of the defendant, who died of pulmonary tuberculosis. The commissioner denied compensation; and, on appeal to the Superior Court, his conclusion was sustained and the appeal dismissed. The case comes to us on appeal of the plaintiff from that judgment.
From the finding of the commissioner, it appears that the deceased was employed by the respondent as a laborer. One of his duties was to assist in moving stones to a stone boat. April 19th, 1929, while…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Linnane v. Aetna Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Cormican v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Galluzzo v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Bailey v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fennell v. Maryland Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1961
- Lemieux v. Highland Dairy Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Maio v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Great American Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Steedley v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.