Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 4, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The claimant’s decedent was in the employ of the respondent as operator of a steam-shovel and for some days prior to July 8th, 1929, had been engaged in excavating in preparation for the building of a large garage in Greenwich. The excavation: had been completed, a runway was being built on which to move the steam-shovel up to the ground level, and on that day the shovel was not used for excavating, but on four or five occasions, for periods of about ten minutes each, the decedent operated the shovel to move timbers used in building the runway. During the intervals between so operating, he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Swanson v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Saunders v. New England Collapsible Tube Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Leszczymski v. Andrew Radel Oyster Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lanyon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Stulginski v. Waterbury Rolling Mills Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Senzamici v. Waterbury Castings Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Drouin v. Chelsea Silk Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Reynolds v. Rider Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.