Legal Opinion

Pinckney v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 9, 2003No. A02A2099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

We granted Antonio Terrell Pinckney’s application for interlocutory review of the superior court’s order denying his motion to suppress certain statements he made to police. For reasons which follow, we conclude that the trial court correctly determined that Pinckney was not in custody when he gave his statements to the officers, and that he made the statements voluntarily.

After receiving reports that Pinckney had molested a neighbor’s eight-year-old child, officers called eighteen-year-old Pinckney and *310asked him to come to the station for an interview. Pinckney…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. State v. RitterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vergara v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. State v. CarderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Estuardo Bernal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API