Legal Opinion

United States v. Harry Sherbondy, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1996No. 95-50462Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

97 F.3d 1463

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Harry SHERBONDY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-50462.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 23, 1996.*

Decided Sept. 25, 1996.

Before: FLETCHER, NOONAN, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Harry Sherbondy, Jr. appeals the district court's denial of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Angel Fernandez-AnguloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Florencio Ortega-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Lino CatabranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API