Legal Opinion

Stalcup v. Eastham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 1, 1959No. 5338PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*239ABBOTT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a suit heard before the court without a jury, interpreting a written contract.

On April 20, 1953 appellant (plaintiff below), sold and delivered to appellees (defendants below) the Dr. Pepper Bottling Company, together with all rights, title and franchise, as well as personal property; the franchise covering Howard, Martin, Midland, Ector, Crane, Glasscock, Borden, Andrews and Dawson counties. In the contract of sale, there appeared the following clause:

“4. Second Party covenants and agrees not to engage in any form of the soft drink bottling or vending…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southwestern Life Ins. Co. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Hilburn v. Herrin Transp. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Eanes Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Recognition Communications, Inc. v. American Automobile Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  3. Reo Industries, Inc. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Kutka v. Temporaries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  5. Grimes v. Walsh & Watts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API