Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Bouchard Transportation Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 29, 1990No. 88 CV 1744PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Third-party defendant moves to dismiss the third-party complaint for failure to state a claim and, in the alternative, for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the motion to dismiss is granted.
FACTS
On March 16, 1987 plaintiff Ronald Kramer allegedly sustained disabling injuries while picking up and positioning a hose on the defendant’s barge Bouchard B-25. This injury occurred during the course of plaintiff’s employment as a dock worker for third-party defendant Amerada Hess Corporation (“Hess”) in Wethersfield, Connecticut, on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ferri v. AckermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Perini North River AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sun Ship, Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- David Vega-Mena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Vega Mena v. U.S.ACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Vega Mena v. U.S.ACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993