Legal Opinion

Felt v. City of Ballard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1905No. 5279PublishedCited by 2 opinions

'Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, T'allman, J., entered May 7, 1904, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to enjoin the collection of a special improvement assessment

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, as owner of lot 37, of block 74, Gilman Park, in the city of Ballard, brought this action to enjoin said city from collecting an assessment levied against said lot for the improvement of Ballard avenue, in said city, and to' declare such assessment null and void. The plaintiff had judgment below, according to the prayer of his complaint, and the defendant appeals therefrom.

The respondent claims that the lot in controversy was wrongfully and illegally included within the assessment district formed for the purpose of paving said avenue, and *301that is the principal question involved…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ryan v. Town of SumnerWashington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amsbary v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Sivyer & Sons Co. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API