Legal Opinion

Comparet v. Jernegan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1840PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This was an action of debt on a promissory note, made and executed in the city of New- York, and payable at the same place. The plaintiffs in their declaration *376claim the legal rate of interest in the state of New-York, _ which they aver to be seven per cent, per annum,. The defendant pleaded nil debet. On the trial, the plaintiffs introduced a witness to prove by parol that, by the laws of the state of New- York, the legal rate of interest was as they had averred and claimed in their declaration. The defendant objected to the testimony, but it was admitted by the Court, to which the defendant…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Packard v. HillNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rothrock v. PerkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Magee v. SandersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Charlotte v. ChouteauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  4. McNeill v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  5. Heberd v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API