Legal Opinion

Heberd v. Myers

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Assumpsit by Myers and others against Heberd on a promissory note made in New-York, and payable at a particular place in that state. Pleas, the general issue, and a special plea that according to the law of the state of New- York, at the time when, &c., a demand at the place, &c., on the day the note fell due, was essential to a right of action. Judgment for the plaintiffs below.

It appears by a bill of exceptions, that the defendants introduced a witness to prove by parol the law of New-York on that subject. But on objection made, the Court excluded the evidence. This is the only error…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Comparet v. JerneganIndiana Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mead v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Smith v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Whitman v. MeissnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API