Plyler v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Chief Judge.
This case requires us to decide whether a defendant who files an application for post-conviction relief challenging a criminal conviction has the right to a peremptory challenge of the judge who presided over the trial which led to the conviction. We conclude that the defendant has no right to a peremptory challenge. Because the judge who conducted a defendant's trial would be familiar with the cireumstances of the trial, we are persuaded that it would be unwise to allow a defendant to disqualify the judge by means of a peremptory challenge. We are also persuaded by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Falcon v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Hensel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Webber v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Staso v. State, Department of TransportationAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lockuk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
- State v. GalbraithCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- Epps v. CVS Health CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Pomeroy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011