Sick v. Michigan Aid Ass'n
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error..
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley, J".
The plea in abatement should not have been sustained in this ease.
The suit is on a peculiar contract of insurance of the life- and health of Frederick Sick, and is instituted in the name of his widow and minor children. If the infants alone had been the beneficiaries, a next friend must have been, appointed for them before instituting suit: Comp. L. § 6531; Wilder v. Ember 12 Wend. 191; but this is in ordeithat the defendant may have some one responsible to him for costs; and the statute has made no such requirement where the infants are joined with an adult plaintiff. Still there…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- King v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
- Judson v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1821
- Wilder v. EmberNew York Supreme Court · 1834
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brunette v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Velthouse v. AlderinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Amwake v. Mercy-Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Moebius v. McCrackenMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- McDonald v. WeirMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.