Legal Opinion
Wilder v. Ember
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1834PublishedCited by 3 opinions
This was a motion to set aside a writ de homine replegiando, sued out by an infant^ without procuring the appointment of a prochein ami.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Nelson, J.
The motion must be granted, the revised statutes, 2 R. S. 446, § 2, requiring the appointment of a next friend before any process shall be issued in the name of an infant.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Sick v. Michigan Aid Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Freyberg v. PelerinNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- Fellows v. NiverNew York Supreme Court · 1836